A Therapeutic Comparison of Robotic Vs Open Vs Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in Patients Diagnosed with Endometrial Cancer
Main Article Content
Abstract
The American Cancer Society estimates that 60,050 cases of endometrial cancer will be diagnosed in 2016 and that 10,470 will die from endometrial cancer during 2016. Since 1988, incidence rates have increased by 1.3 per cent per year for women under 50 and by 1.9 per cent per year. In women age 50 and older, uterine cancers are usually treated with surgery, radiation, hormones, and/or chemotherapy. Uterine cancer is the most common form of gynecologic cancer. Surgery is the mainstay for staging and optimizing treatment for women with endometrial carcinoma. The surgical approach has evolved rapidly since the late 1980s with the introduction of laparoscopy in the surgical staging of endometrial cancer. An alternative to conventional laparoscopy or robotic surgery is single-port Laparoendoscopic 3-incision surgery which further enhances the cosmetic benefits of minimally invasive surgery, avoiding the potential morbidity associated with multiple incisions. Since it has been observed that it offers greater visibility and accuracy of the area of operation. Althoughmost of the advantages are in cases, such as patients with previous abdominal surgeries and obesity
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
I. Minna M. Mäenpää, MD; Kari Nieminen, PhD; Eija I. Tomás, PhD; Marita Laurila, MD; Tiina H. Luukkaala, MSc; Johanna U. Mäenpää, PhD. Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 215: 588.e1-7.
II. Papadakis a. maxine, stephen j. mcphee. Current. cmdt. Medical diagnosis and treatment. Elsevier. mcgraw-hill. 2015.
III. Townsend m. courtney. Surgery treaty. 19th ed. Mexico. Elsevier. 2014.
IV. Brunicardi charles f. schwartz principles of surgery. 10th ed. Mexico. mcgraw-hill. 2015.
V. Ran L, Jin J, Xu Y, Bu Y, Song F. Comparison of Robotic Surgery with Laparoscopy and Laparotomy for Treatment of Endometrial Cancer: A Meta- Analysis. PLoS ONE 9(9): e108361.
VI. Lynette Johnson, W. Douglas Bunn. Clinical comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open hysterectomy procedures for endometrial cancer patients. J Robotic Surg. 2016.
VII. Nezhat F. Perioperative Outcomes in Robotic-Assisted Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Treatment of Endometrial Cancer. J. Adenocarcinoma 2016, 1:1.
VIII. Shao-Hui Chen, Zhao-Ai Li, Rui Huang, Hui-Qin Xue. Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer staging: A meta-analysis. Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 55 (2016) 488e494.
IX. Cohn D, Castellon-Larios K, Huffman L, Salani R, Fowler J, Copeland L et al. A Prospective, Comparative Study for the Evaluation of Postoperative Pain and Quality of Recovery in Patients Undergoing Robotic Versus Open Hysterectomy for Staging of Endometrial Cancer. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 2016; 23 (3):429-434.
X. Eklind S, Lindfors A, Sjöli P, Dahm-Kähler P. A Prospective, Comparative Study on Robotic Versus Open-Surgery Hysterectomy and Pelvic Lymphadenectomy for Endometrial Carcinoma. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. 2015; 25(2):250-256.
XI. Corrado G, Cutillo G, Mancini E, Baiocco E, Patrizi L, Saltari M et al. Robotic single site versus robotic multiport hysterectomy in early endometrial cancer: a case control study. Journal of Gynecologic Oncology. 2016; 27(4).
XII. D.A. Park et al. Comparative safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. EJSO 42 (2016) 1303e1314.
XIII. Taylor B. Turner MD, Ashraf S, Fleming, el alt. Postoperative Pain Scores and Narcotic Use in Robotic-assisted Versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer Staging. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, Vol 22, No 6, September/October 2015.